| Towards a best predictive system account of laws of nature C Dorst The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2019 | 75 | 2019 |
| Humean laws, explanatory circularity, and the aim of scientific explanation C Dorst Philosophical Studies 176, 2657-2679, 2019 | 24 | 2019 |
| Why do the laws support counterfactuals? C Dorst Erkenntnis 87 (2), 545-566, 2022 | 14 | 2022 |
| Evidence, significance, and counterfactuals: Schramm on the new riddle of induction C Dorst Erkenntnis 81, 143-154, 2016 | 6 | 2016 |
| Predictive infelicities and the instability of predictive optimality C Dorst, M Hicks, C Loew, S Jaag Humean Laws for Human Agents, 193-214, 2023 | 3 | 2023 |
| There is no measurement problem for Humeans C Dorst Noûs 57 (2), 263-289, 2023 | 2 | 2023 |
| Laws, melodies, and the paradox of predictability C Dorst Synthese 200 (1), 40, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
| Productive laws in relativistic spacetimes C Dorst | 2 | 2021 |
| Splitting the (In) Difference: Why Fine-Tuning Supports Design C Dorst, K Dorst Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 2022 | 1 | 2022 |
| Fine-tuning divine indifference C Dorst, K Dorst | 1 | 2020 |
| The Best Predictive System Account of Laws of Nature C Dorst The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2018 | 1 | 2018 |
| Does the Best System Need the Past Hypothesis? C Dorst Philosophy of Science 91 (2), 410-429, 2024 | | 2024 |
| In all probability, quite handy: Alan Hájek and Christopher Hitchcock (eds.): The Oxford handbook of probability and philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 880pp … C Dorst Metascience 27 (2), 223-226, 2018 | | 2018 |
| In all probability, quite handy: Alan Hájek and Christopher Hitchcock: The Oxford handbook of probability and philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, 880pp, $150.00 HB C Dorst Metascience 27 (2), 2018 | | 2018 |
| Entrenchment and the Kripke-Wittgenstein paradox C Dorst The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2014 | | 2014 |
| Splitting the (In) Difference in advance C Dorst, K Dorst | | |
